Skip to content

Transport infrastructure – we keep building what we don’t need!

transportElon Musk is one of the biggest names in transport innovation. He is known for investing ahead of the curve, and predicting needs ahead of time. Tesla, SpacEx, the hyperloop. It is no surprise that among his favourite works of science fiction is Isaac Asimov’s famous ‘Foundation’ trilogy. This imagines a universe where mathematics can accurately predict the future. Hari Seldon, the genius behind the concept, uses it to foresee the inevitable fall of the Galactic Empire followed by a terrible dark age lasting 30 000 years. Terrified by this prospect, he proposes the establishment of a Foundation that, by reengineering the present, can limit that period to just a thousand years.

We are doggedly investing over a trillion scarce dollars a year in new carriers, ports, roads, railways and airports. The big question is, are they the right kinds of infrastructure?

In a world of austerity in public finances and scant natural resources, should today’s governments attempt to set up their own Foundation for transport infrastructure?

If there was a way to model the future reliably, would we trust it to redirect this investment? The signs are there. Business-to-business freight transport is no longer able to operate to capacity. The shift in tiger countries from export-driven to consumption-led economies is damping global transport growth. Huge brands like Adidas have begun to near-shore their factories. The increasing scarcity and cost of extracting commodities is improving the case for local recycling, bypassing the need for bulk imports. Public opinion against food miles is creating a market for urban farms, lab-grown meat and hydroponics. The adoption of wide-scale 3D printing may mean that small manufactured goods never see the inside of a container. The switch to renewable energy is cutting down the demand for transported fossil fuels. Even as ever bigger ships and ports are being built, the trend is shifting from mega-ship hub-to-spoke distribution to small carrier point-to-point distribution.

transportIn business-to-consumer freight, the signs are just as persuasive. Business is booming. The culprit? Smart new digital technology, bringing real-time planning, open traffic data, and social customer service. Digital giants like Amazon are gradually transforming into formal transportation service providers, eliminating the waste associated with document handling and freight booking. Agile new digital platforms for crowd-based last-mile delivery solutions such as on-demand delivery services Postmates, Shyp and Deliv are turning investors’ heads. Driverless vehicles, automation and drones are undermining the essence of traditional infrastructures .

And the churn is just as strong in passenger transport. Public authorities see mass multi-modal public transport as the engine of the economy . Congestion, poorly integrated systems, rapid population growth and urbanisation are driving different solutions. Old systems of herding, flat-rate pricing and prioritising the needs of infrastructure are giving way to more bespoke solutions for the passenger. Supported by the Internet of Things, automation and cognitive tech, the sector is being revolutionised.

This future is still a mirage in many parts of the world, but it is resolving into a viable new way of transporting things. How far off it is is, to a certain extent, in our control. Modelling transport on a city-wide scale is already possible . MATsim Singapore is a good example of a powerful tool that simulates transport flows, helping to plan future mobility needs and its supporting infrastructure. Can it be upgraded for modelling international freight?

We can let natural progress take its wasteful course, plunging us into a metaphorical 30,000 years’ transport dark age that we can ill-afford. Or should we set ourselves the task of engineering a less wasteful, faster route serving the public good for a strong economic future?

Hari Seldon, the fictional mathematician, understood that the successful manipulation of the future required a foundation of the best minds in the galaxy to integrate all strands of human knowledge into a unified theory of society. It will take something similar in transport planning and engineering to nudge it onto a path more closely aligned to future need.

Click here to subscribe to Just Imagine.

10 replies »

  1. A stimulating look at the possibilities opened up by data access. There are challenges to being agile and responsive to fast change when massive infrastructure takes long periods of time to deliver and is built to physically last.
    Robin Simpson

    • Thank you Robin.

      Infrastructure, particularly large scale infrastructure, is built with a long time horizon. Changes in demands on infrastructure are nothing new and have necessitated upgrades or abandonment before. Over the last decades though many developments have been of the ‘bigger, faster, larger’ kind, particularly in ports which to a greater or smaller extent could be (partly) accommodated by the existing infra, with some upgrades.
      I wonder if current developments could be leading to a more fundamental shift in requirements and if we should not start looking at different ways of planning and building more flexibly. Rod below makes a ood point that part of the tools are available.


  2. There are powerful commercial drives from a number of sectors to lobby governments for investment into major (and minor) transport infrastructure.

    The underlying culture is to view transport system from the point of view of the stimulation of growth and jobs.

    It would take a paradigm shift to measure the success of transport systems in terms of the ‘elimination of waste’ at a systemic level.

    But this is what the author suggests. The tools, technologies, data and techniques to do this largely exist. Creating and articulating a compelling vision of the future of transport is perhaps a greater challenge.

    • Thanks Rod, well put.

      I do believe that the stimulation and job growth component of future investments does not necessarily need to suffer but you are quite right, a more systemic approach, looking at different scenarios and planning more flexible infra could eliminate a lot of waste in a dynamic future.


  3. Great post and interesting perspective of re-aligning to the future needs and investing into right technologies in the transportation industry.

  4. In a world which changes so quickly is it time to re-examine the design life of infrastructure assets? Is it quicker, cheaper and more useful to build something for a shorter life in anticipation that the needs will change in that life-time and therefore an earlier replacement may serve its community better than something designed for yesteryear. Right sizing investment may also help make limited funding resources ultimately go further while providing better value for public money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.